Skip to content

Frontier development economics inspiring young researchers.

  • About Us
  • Interviews
    • FAQ for Grad Students
  • Topics
  • Food & Ag
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Livestock
    • Food Security
    • Nutrition
  • Health
    • Health
    • Nutrition
  • Environment
    • Environment
    • Climate Change
  • Education
  • ICT
    • Technology
  • More Economics That Really Matters
    • Migration
    • Labor
    • STAARS
    • Editorial
    • Grants, Fellowships, and Proposals
      • Conferences
      • Aid
    • Behavioral Economics
      • Firms
    • Methods
    • Location-Specific
      • Comparative Studies of Countries
      • Mozambique
      • Colombia
      • Somalia
      • Myanmar
      • Indonesia
      • Guatemala
      • Niger
      • Peru
      • Philippines
      • Cambodia
      • Burkina Faso
      • Ghana
      • Pakistan
      • Ivory Coast
      • South Asia
      • Latin America
      • Malawi
      • China
      • DRC
      • Tanzania
      • Mexico
      • Uganda
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Sub-Saharan Africa
      • India
    • Job Market Paper
    • Summaries and Reviews
    • Fieldwork
    • Conflict
    • Gender
    • Public Sector & Governance
    • Social
    • Resilience
    • Human Capital
    • Risk
    • Insurance
    • Poverty

Linking Food Security Research to Policymaking

<a href="https://www.econthatmatters.com/byline/james-allen-iv/" rel="tag">James Allen IV</a>, <a href="https://www.econthatmatters.com/byline/michelle-defreese/" rel="tag">Michelle DeFreese</a>October 19, 2015May 3, 2023Uncategorized

Post navigation

Previous
Next

Michelle DeFreese is a Mickey Leland International Hunger Fellow based at Sokoine Agricultural University (SUA) with the Innovative Agricultural Research Initiative (iAGRI). James Allen IV is the Research Director for the Community and Economic Development Initiative of Kentucky (CEDIK) at the University of Kentucky. Both were members of the Junior Researcher Task Force at the 2nd International Conference on Global Food Security following theme 2.

“It will take the transformation of institutions to transform the livelihood of farmers.” -Joyce Thamaga-Chitja, University of KwaZulu-Natal, GFS 2015.

Policies and institutions will play a critical role in facilitating the next iteration of a Green Revolution, a sentiment echoed throughout the 2nd International Conference on Global Food Security. Whether this will take the form of M. S. Swaminathan’s “Evergreen Revolution” or Prabhu Pingali’s “Gene Revolution,” experts across multiple disciplines recognize the need for agricultural and other policies to manage the structural transformation in the developing world and meet the challenge to feed 9 billion in the next 35 years.

The First Lady of South Africa, Mrs. Gertrude Sizakele Khumalo-Zuma (center) with Vongai Murugani, a PhD student at the University of KwaZulu-Natal (left), and Joyce Thamaga-Chitja, Lecturer in Food Security at the University of KwaZulu-Natal (right). In addition to Mrs. Zuma, several parliamentarians from Ghana were also present at the conference, demonstrating the commitment of high-level policy makers to evidence-based food security policy. Photo by Michelle DeFreese.

Yet, policymakers must understand that good agricultural policy has impact beyond food production. In the opening session of the conference, FANRPAN’s Lindiwe Majele Sibanda noted that agriculture offers solutions to combat high youth unemployment. Policies that can incentivize young people to engage in the agricultural sector have the potential to improve unemployment levels while increasing agricultural productivity. Joyce Thamaga-Chitja of the University of KwaZulu-Natal echoed these sentiments when referring to South Africa’s “catastrophic” unemployment rate and the potential for policies to tackle both youth unemployment and increase agricultural production.

Effective policies should focus on improving smallholder farmers’ access to agricultural markets. In her keynote address, Eleni Gabre-Madhin urged policymakers to pursue channels that would empower smallholder farmers to negotiate contracts with traders. For example, informal exchanges between farmers and traders in Indonesia’s shallot market, highlighted in a presentation by the University of Alberta’s Victoria Zeppa and Sandeep Mohapatra, arise from the lack of market access and price uncertainty in remote areas. Research on market access must also be updated in our ever-changing world. Antony Chapoto presented work on the role of assembly traders in Zambian maize markets suggesting that market access cannot simply be defined as distance to the nearest town. Even in rural Africa, agricultural markets are becoming increasingly complex, and our policy-oriented research must reflect that reality.

South-South cooperation will also play a key role in the development of sound policies and institutions. Nadia Goodman and Christiani Buani of the WFP Centre of Excellence against Hunger (Brazil) demonstrated that social protection policies, such as school-feeding programs in the Gambia and Bangladesh, benefit from the lessons of similar programs implemented in Brazil. While gatherings like the International Conference on Global Food Security offer opportunities for the cross-fertilization of multidisciplinary research and strategies for designing effective policy, more South-South dialogue is needed to discern best practices for nutrition-sensitive food security programming.

Research is leading this effort through project evaluation and cross-country comparisons aimed at showing policymakers the effectiveness of certain interventions. For example, a synthesis of research resulting from rigorous impact evaluations of the World Food Program’s Purchase for Progress (P4P) pilot was presented at the conference by Erin Lentz of University of Texas and Joanna Upton of Cornell University. They found that farmers not associated with P4P were more likely to engage in off-farm activities, begging the question: do large-scale, cash transfer programs discourage farmers from investing in income diversification and, if so, what are the ways policies could be tailored to encourage pro-poor growth while supporting off-farm income generation?

However, research can only do so much, and political will is “an essential ingredient for elevating food and nutrition security into policy agendas,” as recognized in a presentation by Lintelo and Lakshman (2015). Their work seeks to measure political commitment to end hunger and improve nutrition. For this reason, we were heartened that the First Lady of South Africa Mrs. Gertrude Sizakele Khumalo-Zuma (pictured above with conference presenters) and six parliamentarians from Ghana attended last week’s conference. Moving forward, we hope researchers will continue to engage and communicate with policymakers during the design and implementation of policies and programs, focusing on those interventions that offer the greatest potential for improving food security for the world’s poor.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Conferences, Food Security, Public Sector & Governance, Summaries and Reviews

Post navigation

Previous Global Challenges, Local Solutions
Next Proving Malthus wrong, one farm at a time

Published by James Allen IV, Michelle DeFreese

View all posts by James Allen IV, Michelle DeFreese

"Most of the people in the world are poor, so if we knew the economics of being poor, we would know much of the economics that really matters."
Theodore Schultz
Nobel Lecture, 1979
Receive email notifications when new posts are added to the blog.
Loading

Contact Us: econthatmatters@gmail.com or fdf25@cornell.edu or hz399@cornell.edu

Know more about our Authors!

Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Rebalance by WordPress.com.